Nameserver Problem Revisited -

[Jason Staudenmayer]

Yeah bind doesn't link double zones, glad to help kick start the brain.

Jason
..·><((((º>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com 
> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bob 
> Goodwin - W2BOD
> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 3:44 PM
> To: For users of Fedora
> Subject: Re: Nameserver Problem Revisited -
> 
> 
> Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
> > Anything in the log files?
> >
> > Jason
> > ..·><((((º>
> >
> >   
> Yes as it turns out, thanks for asking.
> 
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: starting BIND 9.3.4 -u named -t 
> /var/named/chroot
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: found 2 CPUs, using 2 worker threads
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: loading configuration from 
> '/etc/named.conf'
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: /etc/blocking.conf:29: zone 
> 'ad.doubleclick.net': already exists previous definition: 
> /etc/blocking.conf:15
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: listening on IPv6 interface 
> lo, ::1#53
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 
> 127.0.0.1#53
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: /etc/blocking.conf:29: zone 
> 'ad.doubleclick.net' already exists
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: loading configuration: 
> already exists
> Apr  7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: exiting (due to fatal error)
> 
> I removed the double entry from 
> /var/named/chroot/etc/blocking.conf and 
> then I was able to start named!
> 
> I added some entries to the blocking file late yesterday and 
> I obviously 
> screwed things up, I never would have guessed entering the same URL 
> twice would do that?
> 
> Thanks for the help.
> 
> Bob Goodwin
> 
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com 
> >> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bob 
> >> Goodwin - W2BOD
> >> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 3:26 PM
> >> To: For users of Fedora
> >> Subject: Re: Nameserver Problem Revisited -
> >>
> >>
> >> Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote:
> >>>       
> >>>> Tim wrote:
> >>>>         
> >>>>> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:42 -0400, Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote:
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>> This scheme worked nicely until this morning!
> >>>>>>             
> >> service named status
> >> rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused
> >>
> >>
> >> service named restart
> >> Stopping named:                                            [FAILED]
> >> Starting named:                                            [FAILED]
> >>
> >> Can anyone tell me what might be wrong here?  Everything 
> worked well 
> >> until this morning.
> >>
> >> I can't imagine that I have done anything to cause a problem?
> >>
> >> Bob Goodwin
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> fedora-list mailing list
> >> fedora-list at redhat.com
> >> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >   
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>