Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Tue Apr 10 02:41:36 UTC 2007
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:18:30PM +1000, Res wrote:
> > That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include".
> BS, if the code producers have a complete package and fedora decide they
> dont want to or cant for their own internal policy reasons include a part
> of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS in the
> correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and binaries released by the
> code producers.
Again, nothing is stripped gratuitously. If it's not free software, it can't
be included.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list