Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org
Tue Apr 10 02:41:36 UTC 2007


On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:18:30PM +1000, Res wrote:
> > That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include".
> BS, if the code producers have a complete package  and fedora decide they
> dont want to or cant for their own internal policy reasons include a part
> of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS in the
> correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and binaries released by the
> code producers.

Again, nothing is stripped gratuitously. If it's not free software, it can't
be included.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>




More information about the fedora-list mailing list