Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
Scott van Looy
scott at ethosuk.org.uk
Wed Apr 18 14:22:56 UTC 2007
Today Les Mikesell did spake thusly:
> Scott van Looy wrote:
>>> You must have a different version than I do. But really, this
>>> discussion is somewhat silly.
>>
>> Possibly, but it's been like this for 8 years...you can't compare Win98 or
>> something with FC6, that's just ridiculous
>
> Why not? The concepts that make make fedora and all other Linux versions
> straightforward to install and keep running were inherited from unix and
> well known by the mid-80's. Microsoft just chose to ignore them.
I believe you're forgetting the "fun" of linux in 1998 - or was your copy
of Redhat 5 just as good as FC6?
--
Scott van Looy - email:me at ethosuk.org.uk | web:www.ethosuk.org.uk
site:www.freakcity.net - the in place for outcasts since 2003
PGP Fingerprint: 7180 5543 C6C4 747B 7E74 802C 7CF9 E526 44D9 D4A7
-------------------------------------------
|/// /// /// /// WIDE LOAD /// /// /// ///|
-------------------------------------------
I hope the ``Eurythmics'' practice birth control ...
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list