Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat

[Scott van Looy]

Today Les Mikesell did spake thusly:

> Scott van Looy wrote:
>>> You must have a different version than I do. But really, this
>>> discussion is somewhat silly.
>> 
>> Possibly, but it's been like this for 8 years...you can't compare Win98 or 
>> something with FC6, that's just ridiculous
>
> Why not?  The concepts that make make fedora and all other Linux versions 
> straightforward to install and keep running were inherited from  unix and 
> well known by the mid-80's.  Microsoft just chose to ignore them.

I believe you're forgetting the "fun" of linux in 1998 - or was your copy 
of Redhat 5 just as good as FC6?

-- 
Scott van Looy - email:me at ethosuk.org.uk | web:www.ethosuk.org.uk
site:www.freakcity.net - the in place for outcasts since 2003
PGP Fingerprint: 7180 5543 C6C4 747B 7E74  802C 7CF9 E526 44D9 D4A7
       -------------------------------------------
       |/// /// /// /// WIDE LOAD /// /// /// ///|
       -------------------------------------------

I hope the ``Eurythmics'' practice birth control ...