The case against LVM

[Terry Polzin]

On Tuesday July 31 2007, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I've been using LVM on one computer for some time,
> without any real problems.
>
> However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications,
> as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices,
> while I don't find any real advantages to compensate.
>
> I thought it would simplify changing the sizes of partitions,
> but as it happens I never need to do this
> with today's enormous disks.
>
> I wonder if that is the general experience?
Definitely an asset when connected to a SAN.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070731/60111b6c/attachment-0001.sig>