The case against LVM

[Terry Polzin]

On Tuesday July 31 2007, Timothy Murphy wrote:

> > Definitely an asset when connected to a SAN.
>
> Why, as a matter of interest?

I'm sorry, I thought you wanted cases presented in favour of LVM.

It has it's place where it's use is appropriate and I use it on my machines 
that are connected to my SAN.  It is sometimes easier to use some of the LVM 
utilities to manage LUNs presented to a linux box than the SAN especially 
when resizing a LUN.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070801/f898da2b/attachment-0001.sig>