Is this a tcpwrapper bug?

[Jonathan Underwood]

On 17/12/2007, Tom Horsley <tom.horsley at att.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:05:04 +0900
> John Summerfield <debian at herakles.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
> > I don't see that tcpwrappers does a lot for you in this case than you
> > can also do with iptables.
>
> Sure it does: It achieves exactly what I want, and doesn't require
> yet another daemon to be running with yet another obscure
> command language to learn :-). (The hosts.allow syntax is only
> about 1/10th as obscure as the iptables commands).

There's nothing wrong with the hosts.allow approach, but do note that
using the iptables approach doesn't require yet another daemon to be
running.