: F8 Network Woe

[Aaron Konstam]

On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 14:13 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Aaron Konstam:
> >>> We already determined that 192.168.1.6 is not the machine's address,
> 
> Tim:
> >> I don't recall seeing a message stating what was the true cause of the
> >> rejection.
> 
> Aaron Konstam:
> > When the OP ran service network restart
> > it would not restart getting an error that that ip address was already
> > in use. That means to me that the ip address could not be asigned to the
> > machine in question. 
> 
> To the *interface* in question...  But anyway, I've already read that,
> and it doesn't really address the first two quoted paragraphs above your
> reply (the "why" and a proper "resolution").
> 
> By the way, who's c: erappy client made the subject line go "Re: Re: Re:"?
I agree tha innerface is the coorrect word. It is also true that we have
not solved the originall question but the problem has been circumvented
by choosing a different ip.

Yourmail client must be among those who resulted in the Re: Re: subject
line. Actually it was caused by someone forwarding instead of replying.

--
=======================================================================
In America, it's not how much an item costs, it's how much you save.
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam at sbcglobal.net