Seahorse vs Evolution ?

[Karl Larsen]

Robin Laing wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:29 -0500, William Case wrote:
>>> Hi;
>>
>>
>> I really wish more open source developers would think about users who
>> may end up needing to regress before they alter stuff that breaks
>> earlier versions of their app. But that's a side issue.
>>
>
> You also have to look at the changes that RedHat/Fedora make to their 
> versions of packages.  I have come across these changes over the 
> years.  Enough to create headaches.
>
> I see this on enough mail lists to know that not all changes are for 
> the best.
>
> I do agree that all setup data should be consistent trough iterations 
> of software.  But there are times that changes are necessary.  When 
> these times occur, make sure that there are fall back routines.
>
    I have been fighting trouble with GPG. It is here on F8 but it 
appears to make un-usuable keys. People who have used Seahorse seem to 
succeed in making keys that work with the Fedora Doc. It looks like I 
must re-do everything with Seahorse. A real pain.

Karl


-- 

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.
   PGP 28AC 2D41 EF25 0417 7166  DD81 44BD ABFC FA8E C752