Need a fetchmail guru (JoAnne D.?) who's been using it to pop his/her gmail
Gene Heskett
gene.heskett at verizon.net
Thu Dec 27 11:14:14 UTC 2007
On Wednesday 26 December 2007, Tim wrote:
>Tim:
>>> I'd ditch the notion of using an ISP's crappy mail system when you
>>> can easily use a much better server, elsewhere.
>
>Gene Heskett:
>> Yeah, I'm seeing hour plus outages here. And you can't tell whats
>> going on cuz they have the ping response and traceroute responders
>> disabled, security ya know. vz, being in bed with M$, has to do all
>> that. Dumb...
>
>To be honest, pinging is a less than adequate test. It only tests one
>aspect of networking. It certainly doesn't test anything to do with a
>mail server (the server software, that part that actually relates to
>"mail" serving).
>
>I wouldn't be all that surprised if they'd turned off too much (like the
>hapless users who'll foolishly block *all* ICMP traffic).
>
>> Ask an email related question on the tech support line (now there is
>> an oxymoron for you, "tech support") and mention kmail, then you have
>> to tell them its linux & they say "whazzat, we don't support anything
>> but winderz and macs." About that time I get pi$$y and point out that
>> a std protocol is a std protocol. And that they aren't following it.
>
>For larger ISPs, I recommend lying. Pretend you're using Outlook. The
>usual webmonkeys can't access logs (they just read a prepared script at
>you, or make a fault log entry for someone else to fix) or wouldn't know
>how to interpret them.
And at that point they want to start a remote session so they can walk around
in your computer. I should tell them to go ahead and try & see how far they
get when the first box connected to their modem is running a recent DD-WRT.
But I usually tell them sorry, its linux and your little virii has never
worked and if I have anything to do with it, it never will.
Why is it that while there is supposed to be one rectum per mouth, it seems
like such a lopsided ratio in favor of a surplus of them?
>I prefer the smaller ISPs, ones that own themselves. You've more chance
>of actually talking to a tech that maintains their gear. And even more
>chance that they use Linux, either because they're an enthusiast or they
>use Linux servers.
All they have is dialup around here, darnit. And they contract out the
maintenance/config duties.
>I find it amusing that it seems the smaller ISPs *need* less technical
>support staff. I can only imagine it's because they actually keep their
>gear working. ;-)
Yup, and if it takes too much time to keep a winderz box doing a job, next
thing you know its a linux box doing that job. Country boy dumb maybe,
doesn't mean stupid.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
You will be the last person to buy a Chrysler.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list