How NSA access was built into Windows
Lyvim Xaphir
knightmerc at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 16 05:39:12 UTC 2007
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 15:54 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> >>> Taking the opposite line of attack, it is possible to completely
> >>> remove it from a Linux installation, isn't it?
>
>
> Lyvim Xaphir:
> >> Good question. I'd like to find out about that myself.
>
> Steven P. Ulrick:
> > I don't know if this is a full answer to the above question, but I
> > thought that I'd try running "yum remove *selinux*" just for fun. See
> > the result at: http://www.afolkey2.net/Projects/selinux.txt
> >
> > For the impatient, the file referred to above says that I would need
> > to remove 979 RPM's:
>
> [including the kernel]
>
> I'd be inclined to try using something other than YUM, though. Having
> read messages about yum removing one package resulting in the complete
> removal of Gnome or KDE, etc...
>
> Of course, you don't have to use the provided kernels, likewise for
> other packages. You could roll your own without any dependency on
> SELinux. Though that rather obviates the purpose for using a distro.
>
> --
> (Currently testing FC5, but still running FC4, if that's important.)
>
> Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
> I read messages from the public lists.
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list