How NSA access was built into Windows
Lyvim Xaphir
knightmerc at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 18 20:22:08 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:24 -0800, David Boles wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 January 2007 12:04, Ric Moore wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:12 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> >>> You are absolutely right about the applications being compiled for
> >>> libselinux. I tested this the hard way by ripping it out with rpm -ev
> >>> --nodeps. Basically it hosed the system; the box would not even boot
> >>> anymore. Kernel panic reared it's head early on in the boot process.
> >> You're a good man Lyvim, thank you for giving it a go, now the rest of
> >> us learned by your experience! :) Ric
> >
> > Yes, please add my thanks to the chorus too.
>
>
> How long have you paranoid SELinux bashers been using Fedora Core? SELinux has
> been in Fedora Core at least since FC-3 and I think that I remember it in
> FC-2. So whatever it is that you don't want the world to see it could have
> already seen. ;-)
So Selinux Question=Stupid. Yeah, got it.
> Google is your friend. If any of you would have spent a small part of the
> time researching what SELinux really does and why it does it, as you have
> bashing it incorrectly for what it does not do, this conversation would have
> ended long ago.
Haven't seen much bashing, but I have seen alot of questions being
bandied about. But whatever cracks your chestnuts.
>
> This list has turned into a chat list and seeing this thread has ended for me.
> 'Plonk'.
Ahh well......so departs another of the New Castrati.
LX
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list