Udev problem - more investigation

Anne Wilson cannewilson at tiscali.co.uk
Fri Jan 19 17:07:05 UTC 2007


On Friday 19 January 2007 16:00, Roberto Malinverni wrote:
> Our strategies seem to be different. You wrote a rule file with a high
> number, so that it is the last to be parsed and nothing *should* interfere
> with it. I wrote a rule file with a low number, so that it is parsed at the
> beginning excluding every interference from other scripts.
> The sintax for the option I mentioned is IIRC:
> OPTIONS="last_rule"
> The string as to be appended, after the usual comma, at the end of a given
> rule. This prevents that other rules are parsed against the same device.
> Other interesting info about what is involved in the process of creating
> devices are here:
> http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=103665&highlight=udev+bla
>c k+magic
> http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showpost.php?p=668532&postcount=4
> Sorry if I can't be of more help.

The second one is the 'meat' from the first one.  Interesting, though.

I tried the suggestion in there, and from then on the symlink failed to be 
created at all :-)

Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070119/bddbe259/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list