A really good article on software usability
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at tiscali.co.uk
Fri Jan 5 16:13:20 UTC 2007
On Friday 05 January 2007 15:21, Andy Green wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> >> Yes, that's the point. For a lot of things, software should work
> >> like an appliance. If the thing that needs to be done can be
> >> predicted, just do it without offering any choices.
> >
> > <scream.......> Where have I seen that idea? Oh yes, in systems that I
> > won't use.
>
> Well, you use lightswitches presumably. It is a good idea, but only if
> the device is understood to do one simple thing you can explain to
> someone that never saw it before in a handful of words. If what it does
> is inherently complex, don't try shoehorn it into lightswitch semantics
> (ye height-challenged people are you listening).
>
Not the same thing at all. Where the only options are on/off you can *only*
reverse the current state. I wouldn't want the switch to be making the
decision for me as to whether I actually wanted to do that or leave it alone
<g>
Where there is only one course of action - e.g. exit or no exit - then maybe
you don't need any dialogue box. Where there is the option to exit after
saving or exit without saving I definitely want to be the one to choose. *I*
want to decide whether the change that caused the question to be asked is
significant or not.
Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070105/03eac77d/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list