fc7 should be f7

[Jim Cornette]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> 
> No, it's not easier for someone to explain something when they are many 
> points in that discussion so don't expect me to do a big summary but in 
> short: Breaking an upgrade path in many scenarios for what is 
> effectively a trivial name change in the package is more pain than gain. 
>  Fedora Extras already had "fc" packages so it's not like there is 
> anything very new to discuss. 

Since you knew about the discussion and endured the thread, I understand 
that you would rather head off a debate on this list and would rather 
point to the archives for more information. It just sounded to me when 
reading the post to be presented as we should have not asked here but 
known to read the fedora-development list archives in advance.

Keeping the c is fine with me if it keeps rpm updating systems better 
that it would if the c was dropped. I was satisfied with the "Fedora 
collections" response on the fedora-test list when I asked the question.

> If you really want to follow development, subscribe to the
> development list or read the Fedora weekly news which offers
> relatively short summaries.

I probably will resubscribe since there is a lot of information that the 
discussions provide. I'll check out the Fedora weekly news to see what 
it provides.

Jim

> 
> Rahul