Digital signatures

David Boles dgboles at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 17:30:59 UTC 2007


on 7/12/2007 10:01 AM, Les wrote:
> I am starting this thread because I see many folks signing their emails
> with a digital signature.  I believe these things to be less effective
> and in fact more dangerous than you might expect.  Here is a link to a
> page from an earlier post that refers to such issues:
> http://www.badsoftware.com/digsig.htm
> 
> I believe that if we are to trust our systems, we must be aware of the
> risks inherent in some of the commonly accepted practices.  Many of you
> here are system admins for companies.  The risks must be assessed
> reasonably for the protection of your company and clients.  
> 
> 	We should all be aware that seemingly unimportant information when
> processed in large collections with other seemingly unimportant
> information is a powerful tool in predicting future actions, or possible
> intrusions into your life.  Pattern development, especially a relatively
> new science called emergence is a very powerful analysis tool.
> 
> Regards,
> Les H


1997? Can't you find any FUD newer than 1997?


-- 

  David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070712/2b99db33/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list