RPM naming question.
Todd Zullinger
tmz at pobox.com
Thu Jul 12 19:09:00 UTC 2007
Rick Stevens wrote:
> To humans, yes, but the "L" parses later than the corresponding ".":
>
> |
> v
> foo-0.6.5-7.fc7.rpm
> foo-0.6.5-7L.fc7.rpm
> ^
> |
>
> I suspect the script is doing a character-by-character comparison, so
> the shorter string has precedence and the "." is earlier in the ASCII
> sequence than the "L" as well.
The fedora-rpmvercmp script uses the python interface to rpm and calls
the labelCompare function to do the comparison. So the rules used are
what rpm uses. I find it's best not to think to hard about the odd
ways that rpm tries to deal with versioning. ;)
The point is that it's a good tool to use in a situation like Aaron
had where he needed to know whether the EVR (epoch, version, release)
he was planning to use would evaluate as newer by rpm.
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Would you let the aliens land, please? They might be here to pick me
up.
-- Bill Hicks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070712/4fc8af74/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list