Question on yum remove

[Steve Searle]

Around 12:04am on Sunday, June 17, 2007 (UK time), Timothy Murphy scrawled:

> You misunderstood me (I think)
> As far as I can see, "yum remove foo" removes foo,
> and also everything that foo depends on.
> Then it removes everything that depends on the things already removed.
> And so ad infinitum.
> 
> I would have thought it would be more logical
> to leave anything required by another package.
> 
> Of course anything that requires foo should be removed.
> But that is a different matter.

Apologies - I didn't read your email carefully enough.  I agree it
shouldn't be doing that. 

Steve

-- 

A:  Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q:  Why is top-posting a bad thing?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070617/3089299d/attachment-0001.sig>