tons of spam

Ed Greshko Ed.Greshko at
Mon Jun 18 14:37:05 UTC 2007

Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 20:46 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> jdow wrote:
>>> Chu - directing that at greshko might have been more appropriate.
>>> "Ed" was most impolite for no good reason. "Scroom and the horse
>>> he rode in on," would be a suitable reply for Ed's behavior.
>> I'm not sure about "no good reason".  Somebody signs up for a mailing list
>> with their "normal" email address and it gets harvested and they get more
>> spam and then say the distribution is flawed based on that.....well it just
>> gets my goat.  The induhvidual blames everyone except themselves.
>> Let's not get into a tit for tat on "behavior" shall we.  I can surely point
>> out times where others "behavior" went over my line....or is it over your
>> line....or is it over some imaginary line....
>> The simple point I suppose I should have made put your email
>> address on a public list and you expose yourself to spam.  Should the email
>> list be responsible to protect you from your folly?  I think not.
> Just when were you appointed Fedora's "Defender and Chief"?

Never said I was or claimed to be.  Some folks enjoy to attach labels.

Should I stay silent when an injustice is done?

Recursion is the root of computation since it trades description for time.

More information about the fedora-list mailing list