Is prelink really randomizing every two weeks?
theatre at sasktel.net
Tue Jun 19 02:41:08 UTC 2007
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:13:53 +1000
Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> wrote:
> | Right up there with using non-standard pipe symbols for your quoting
> | character, perhaps?
> They don't make things not work. I just find them easier on the eyes
> than the jagged > chars.
Non-standard quoting characters break the colorizing that some mail clients do
to set off various levels of reply.
> Given the amazingly high forgery rate of spam headers, does this
> really achieve anything?
These day? I don't know. I haven't seen that particular stunt in some number
of years, actually. The NOSPAM trick here just reminded me of that. Old home
week and all that, you know.
> I still maintain it breaks the abuse channel
> for the sending of genuine complaints.
How so? What could constitute a more genuine abuse complaint than "here's some
spam and it originates from the headers in this message"?
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
More information about the fedora-list