selinux eradicator?

[Tom Horsley]

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:17:40 -0500
Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Yes, they do. Because currently the onus is still on the
> side of proponents of SELinux to show that it is conclusively
> better than what already exists. 

No, no, no, it isn't about the technology :-).

The true value of selinux will appear when redhat pays
off enough Sarbanes-Oxley consultants to get the SOX
community to declare all computers must run a security
system which may not need to actually be selinux, but
merely has to meet requirements which are cut & pasted
from the selinux spec.

Then selinux becomes a mint for printing money :-).