DKIM - RFC 4871 -

[Mail List]

On Wednesday 06 June 2007 11:51:50 pm Ed Greshko wrote:
> > sign using DK as well as DKIM - which you probably dont.
>
> Ahhh, now the statement makes sense.
>
> I've read rfc4871 and the historical rfc4870.  Picking similar names caused
> the confusion on my part.
>
> Thanks for pointing it out.
>

   It is connfusing for me too  ... I have the milter working - it was pretty 
simple to set up - check the mail headers you will (should) see the 
signatures in this message too - if you added verify to your sendmail they 
would be verified too.