Cannot upgrade from FC6->F7. No upgrade option given in install screen. (and RAID remnant)

Jim Cornette fc-cornette at insight.rr.com
Fri Jun 8 03:23:54 UTC 2007


Lou Spironello wrote:
> Dear Jim:
> 
> Please forgive me for NOT including fstab.  I thought I had but I did
>  not.  Since I am currently not at my machine and "out of the
> building" I cannot upload my fstab, however, I can asure you that all
> devices referenced in fstab are labeled as well as any partition on
> the disk.

I think that you sent it before. I remember all of the d# entries. It 
might be good to use e2label and add meaningful labels to the 
mountpoints, evwn if you use d and the number. That way if there is some 
change in the future affecting device naming, you will be one step safer.


> 
> I still see remnants of raid, i.e. /dev/md0 continues to be created
> upon reboot. I was #fedora irc yesterday speaking with someone who
> seem quite knowledgeable about these issue and he suggested to comment
> out the template reference to the md device in
> /dev/makedev.d/01linux-2.6.???   /dev/md0 was recreated upon reboot 
> again.

Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought the md device was gone after 
running the gauntlet of disk management utilities.

This link briefly talks about some md management and udev. I only see 
topics which may clear up what raid is doing.

http://www.issociate.de/board/post/429713/removed_disk_&&_md-device.html


The next article sounds informative to familiarize one regarding raid. I 
will probably read the article in depth. There has to be some clue as to 
how to prevent the md0 at zero byte from lingering around the disk.


> 
> re: the confusing in the installer.  I thought about that when I saw
> the FC6 had labeled /boot as /boot1 and /usr as /usr1 so I relabeled
> those /boot1->/boot and /usr1->/boot and nada.  Didn't fix it.

Usually that happens if you have another installation on the same 
computer. I have had several /1, /boot1 entries on my multi-version 
Fedora computers. As you found out, only the references to whatever it 
is called matters. If I use e2label, I usually label using a variety of 
names.



> 
> /etc/fstab
> 
> <snip>
> 
> LABEL=/                 /                  ext3    defaults 1 1 
>LABEL=/boot             /boot               ext3    defaults 1 2
  devpts                /dev/pts        devpts gid=5,mode=620  0 0
>tmpfs                   /dev/shm     tmpfs   defaults        0 0 
>LABEL=/home             /home ext3    defaults               1 2 
>proc                    /proc proc    defaults               0 0 
>sysfs                   /sys sysfs   defaults                0 0 
>LABEL=/usr              /usr ext3    defaults                1 2 
>LABEL=SWAP-hda5         swap	      swap    defaults        0 0
> 
> /dev/hdc1              /mnt/d1            ext3    defaults 0 0 
 >/dev/hdc2               /mnt/d2            ext3    defaults 0 0
>/dev/hdc3               /mnt/d3            ext3    defaults 0 0 
>/dev/hdd1               /mnt/d4            ext3    defaults 0 0 
>/dev/hdd2               /mnt/d5            ext3    defaults 0 0 
 >/dev/hdd3               /mnt/d6            ext3    defaults 0 0
>/dev/hdd4               /mnt/d7            ext3    defaults 0 0
> 
> </snip>
> 
> 
> I just tried the f7-updates.img using: linux
> updates=http:/people.redhat.com/clumens/f7-updates.img
> 
> and anaconda prompted for local ip and appeared to retrieve the
> image.
> 
> However, that apparently didn't fix the problem.  After it searched
> for previous releases I received the "Partition Type" screen with no
> screen to select the type of install, i.e. install or upgrade.

I was not sure if your problem would be fixed by the updated image. 
Briefly reading the explanation on how to use the updated image it seems 
you launch the DVD and choose the additional updates selection. I was 
thinking that it was just a boot disk which would ask for file location.

> 
> I'm at my wits end.  I'm attempting to move /etc /home /usr/local
> /var/www but thinking that might have to reformat but I don't know if
> I have the space to move the files.

Someone mentioned tarring up the information, splitting them into 4 GB 
files awhile back or something along those lines.

> 
> Any other ideas?  Ideas about removing that /dev/md0 device?

The installer anaconda incorporates disk druid which I believe you could 
remove the raid element. I don't know if you could remove the md and not 
mess up your system by the installer going on after the disk information 
is saved or not. I assume the installer will go ahead and overwrite or 
copy to the same locations.

Regarding ideas to gt rid of raid, I have no ideas other than just don't 
do Raid in the first place. A David Gilmour song come to mind. "No Way 
out" .. (In for good)

> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks again. Regards, Lou
> 
> 
> - What about you labels in fstab? would they confuse the installer?
> Are they LABEL references or device references?
> 

The /dev/hdc# and /dev/hdd# entries could confuse the installer.

I would backup important information and then try a yum upgrade to FC7. 
I did one and it worked out OK to allow what used to work to still work 
after upgrade. I dd not need to reconfigure the system.

Maybe someone familiar with raid will chime in. I seem to remember 
something on the test list being discussed regarding a command to issue 
to get rid of raid. You might ask on the test ist or search the archive 
for information.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Awww.redhat.com%2Farchives%2Ffedora-test-list+raid&btnG=Search

Jim




More information about the fedora-list mailing list