Updates - evolution issue with your David's messages

[Les]

On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:49 -0700, David Boles wrote:
+++++++++++++ from here +++++++++++++++++++++++
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>  
> Tim wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:13 -0700, David Boles wrote:
> >> Hmm..  That's odd. I always leave two blank lines both before and
> >>  after for an 'inline message reply'  and two lines after and
> >> 'end of post' reply.  I have been scolded for doing that (it
> >> should only be one line according to some)  but never for what
> >> you describe.
> >
> > Can you have a look at your raw message source, this is what I saw
> > in your previous one (minus all the headers for where the mail went
> >  through).  I see no gap between quote and reply, and a - --
> > signature separator.
> >
> > I know Thunderbird is fond of not posting things as you typed them,
> > nor showing things exactly as they are received.  They're just two
> > reasons why I won't use it.
> 
> 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ to here is not visible until I open
reply ++++++++
> Okay. This is an 'in message' reply. There are two blank lines above
> and there will be two blank lines below. Tell me what you see please.
> 
> 
> > ------------ beginning of my paste ---------------
> >
> > X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 X-loop:
> > fedora-list at redhat.com Subject: Re: Updates X-BeenThere:
> > fedora-list at redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: junk
> > Reply-To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list at redhat.com> List-Id: For
> > users of Fedora <fedora-list.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe:
> > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
> > <mailto:fedora-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
> > List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
> > List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list at redhat.com> List-Help:
> > <mailto:fedora-list-request at redhat.com?subject=help>
> > List-Subscribe:
> > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
> > <mailto:fedora-list-request at redhat.com?subject=subscribe> Sender:
> > fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com Errors-To:
> > fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com Status: O X-UID: 79917
> > Content-Length: 1370 X-Keywords:
> >
> >
> > X-Evolution-Source: imap://tim@imap.lan.cameratim.com/
> >
> > Tim wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 12:22 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote:
> >>> I had to load a new FC6 on my laptop and when I brought it up
> >>> the Package Updater told me there was 277 Updates! I see they
> >>> are many of them just replacement RPM's of the whole thing. I
> >>> used to hate
> > Windows
> >>> for all their update packages :-)
> >> At least with Linux, the updates replace the broken stuff on your
> >>  machine, and you don't need to hang onto to the update packages.
> >> ;-)
> >
> >> I've watched Windows fill up the drive with downloaded patches
> > that you
> >> must keep on the drive, and it applies some patches on top of
> >> what
> > it's
> >> doing each run-time (booting gets slower and slower).
> > I have watched, and I admit that I have actually replied, to this
> > poster in the beginning. I have yet to see him acknowledge or reply
> > to anything. Everything is a 'big deal' or a disaster or something.
> >  Nothing works well or is as it should be with Fedora Core 6 or
> > Fedora 7.
> >
> > Sniff... Sniff...    I think that I smell a troll....
> >
> 
> - --
> 
>   David
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
>  
> iD8DBQFGclKRrItTyWRhT1YRAgrqAKC+xTm+Hm46mrlw8QtEAsW2Uvi4fACeLKp8
> q163xBhkf0DbCh8J2PlJlYA=
> =7sEU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

Note the comments in line above.
Regards,
Les H