Where are all the updates gone?

Todd Zullinger tmz at pobox.com
Fri Mar 2 17:18:54 UTC 2007


Olaf Mueller wrote:
> I am wondering where are all the updates remain for fc6. Is fc6 bad
> supported although fc7 is not released?

I'm not sure why you'd think that.  There are plenty of updates being
pushed for fc6 still.

> The packages I am missing updates for are:
> koffice*

I didn't feel like looking for this in bugzilla, but I'd bet it
wouldn't take long to check.

> clamav-server-sysv
> clamav-lib
> clamav-update
> clamav-milter-sysv
> clamav
> clamav-server
> clamav-data
> clamav-milter

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229202 .

> htdig (current fc6 version is not usable)

Is there a bugzilla entry about whatever problem you have with htdig?

> It is funny cause there are already new clamav-* (0.90) packages for
> fc7

See the bug above.

> But fc7 is not released and nobody of redhat or fedora core
> like to support fc6 any more, seems to me. But is not fc6 the version
> users are working with at the moment?
> Now, I am at the point I do not understand fedora any more.
> Ok, I get it. Fedora Core is only a playground, nothing more, nothing
> stable, nothing with a long lifespan.
> It is frustrating.

Ok, I get it.  Ask a question, answer it yourself, make a mountain out
of a mole hill.  What sort of response would you expect from the
above?

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
The problem is not that the world is full of fools. The problem is
that lightning isn't being distributed right.
    -- Mark Twain

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070302/ce8b4c02/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list