Nvdia module
Walter Garcia-Fontes
walter.garcia at upf.edu
Tue Mar 6 15:53:27 UTC 2007
* Claude Jones [06/03/07 16:38]:
> The danger you cite has never manifested for me. If the module fails to build,
> generally, the system just boots using the Linux nv driver - I've never
> experienced the event you describe.
>
I have limited experience, but a very bad one. When I tried to install
the dell provided rpm I was left with messages at boot up that the
nvdia module was missing and couldn't do much still I found the livna
driver.
> Regarding your question, it seems like even should that be possible, you would
> end up doing more work than just putting up with a couple of days delay till
> the new Livna modules are released - but, your concerns/needs may be
> different than mine
>
No problem with waiting, my concern is that this morning I had to reboot
and found out that the last kernel that yum had updated last night was
not able to use my previous nvidia module. So how should I proceed with the
updates? If I update the kernel in a couple of days will "yum"
download the nvdia driver automatically, or should I update it
simultaneously? I'm sort of confused as you see...
Another question. In Gnome if I go to System - Administration -
Display - Hardware - Video Card - Configure
I see that the one that is chosen is:
nvidia - Vendor supplied driver for nvdia cards
while just above I can see:
nv - nvidia Riva 128, RIVA TNT, GeForce, Nforce and Quadro cards
My card is
256Mb nVidia Quadro FX3500 Graphics Card
shouldn't then I be using the "nv" configuration instead of the
"nvidia" one?
--
Walter Garcia-Fontes
Barcelona
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list