OT: Pine - Reply To Address

[CH]

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Tim wrote:
> Just a note:  If your from and reply-to addresses are actually the same
> details, you shouldn't have a reply-to header.  You're not *supposed* to
> do that (it's an overriding instruction, which is logically silly if
> it's the same), and some daft clients will make a mess when people reply
> to you (you'll get two replies).


Tim,
Thanks for pointing that out :)  I appreciate that.  I will change that now.

Thanks,
Will