CentOS vs stability: req a Fedora / RHEL perspective
Tony Nelson
tonynelson at georgeanelson.com
Fri May 25 16:47:39 UTC 2007
At 9:59 PM -0500 5/24/07, Les Mikesell wrote:
>Tony Nelson wrote:
...
>> That choice would be mostly by hand yum-updating, right? Do a yum update,
>> sa "no", pick the parts I want and yum update package1 package2?
>
>Yes - but there is rarely a reason to do that with stock centos packages.
OK.
...
>I'd guess that's the biggest set of changes we'll see for 4.x.
I sure hope so. 182 packages was a lot.
>I had
>3.x servers in production before 4.x was released and had to pick
>something for a larger rollout right after its release and went with the
>sure thing. Even a few months later I would have used 4.x and just been
>a little more careful about testing the new kernels before updating the
>remote boxes.
OK, thanks.
--
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson at georgeanelson.com>
' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list