FC2 to 5 upgrade

Akemi Yagi amyagi at gmail.com
Thu May 3 19:31:09 UTC 2007


On Thu, 03 May 2007 09:38:21 +0700, Strong wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:51:39 +0100 Chris Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>> > CentOS or Scientific Linux give you essentially the same packages
>> > without the support contract (and thus also without the cost
>> > associated with it).
> 
> It seems its repos are very poor. At least comparing to Fedora's. May I
> will change for CentOS but this prevents me from doing so...

I believe you mean 3rd party repositories.  If you are dependent on many
packages that are only available from 3rd party repos, yes, CentOS might
not be for you. However, you might want to take a look at the current list
of repositories for CentOS to see if what you need is now included:

http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories

Akemi





More information about the fedora-list mailing list