Web server

Zahn Daltocli daltocli at gmail.com
Sat May 5 12:38:09 UTC 2007


2.0 will be great, yes. Allows things like any element can be a hyperlink.

Even if it's HTML4 rendered as XML, that's still better then using 
purely HTML4.01.

HTML is DEAD, has been for years. Using it is rather pointless - unless 
you want to be backwards!

Scott van Looy wrote:
> Today Zahn Daltocli did spake thusly:
>
>> I'd use XHTML 1.1 personally. HTML is outdated. HTML4.01 has been 
>> around for YEARS (Nearly a decade) with no signs of HTML5 being 
>> released (they say it will, but looks very doubtful).
>>
>> XHTML is more interesting to play with, is up-to-date and allows more 
>> functionality.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/
>
> Doesn't. XHTML 1 is simply HTML 4 rendered as XML - 1.1 doesn't have 
> much in the way of new features. When 2 is released it'll be amazing...
>




More information about the fedora-list mailing list