Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
Robin Laing
Robin.Laing at drdc-rddc.gc.ca
Wed May 16 15:35:38 UTC 2007
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On 15/05/07, Robin Laing <Robin.Laing at drdc-rddc.gc.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Having just seen Ubuntu for the first time, I can see the differences.
>>
>> Ubuntu is geared more towards the general public where Fedora is
>> directed more toward corporate users. I say this as Fedora, from what I
>> have seen follows a more secure installation and higher concern for
>> possible IP/copyright infringement. This causes it's own sets of
>> problems though.
>
> I don't think that corporate users could stand the instability of
> Fedora. Corporate needs rock-solid software. RHEL, maybe, but not
> Fedora.
>
In our experience, Fedora is rock-solid, at least in comparison to
Windows. My work machine runs until there is a new kernel upgrade.
Most of the Fedora machines run BOINC (We are R&D) in the background as
well as our Fedora Cluster.
Some people have just installed Ubuntu onto their work machines.
>> An example is where I work, for multimedia work, Ubuntu is a better
>> choice. We needed a machine to run videos and other multimedia files
>> that won't run on Windows machines. We now have a Ubuntu machine just
>> for this purpose.
>>
>> For secure work, Fedora looks better. The best example of this is the
>> dreaded SELinux. In Fedora, this is default but Ubuntu it is an add-on.
>>
>> In regards to updates, I was watching Synaptic (sp?) update the Ubuntu
>> machine and to be honest, I didn't see any difference between kyum and
>> it on the front end.
>>
>> There may be problems with yum and rpm but I have not found that to be
>> in my case. I have found yum to be quite handy and my only issues come
>> more from the different repositories than yum or rpm.
>>
>> So, for now, I will stick with Fedora due to the security issues. If
>> Ubuntu decides to follow suite, then I will look at it again. That is
>> as long as I can find secondary repositories that will meet my
>> multimedia requirements.
>
> You'll ifnd that enabling non-free software is a lot easier in Ubuntu
> than in Fedora. Not that it's difficult in Fedora, but in Ubuntu, one
> can click on an MP3, then click Yes Yes Yes until it plays.
>
> Dotan Cohen
>
It didn't work that well on the machine I witnessed being setup but it
was no worse than Fedora. As long as you can find a decent HowTo on
setting up Multimedia, then life is great.
--
Due to the move to M$ Exchange Server,
anything that is a priority, please phone.
Robin Laing
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list