Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)

[Thomas Cameron]

Mauriat M wrote:
> On 5/15/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> Yep. If half of the people who are willing to discuss the nature of
>> Fedora in length step further to actually contribute that would make a
>> pretty big difference but alas folks are more interested in calling it
>> unstable or wanting the distribution to including proprietary software
>> by default.
>>
>> Next time you want to complain ask yourself how much you have
>> contributed in anyway at all to a every growing collection of Free
>> software included in a distribution that you can get for free. That
>> includes a lot of work many of which is volunteer driven in maintaining
>> around 8000 packages, documentation, artwork, QA, release engineering,
>> infrastructure, marketing etc.
>>
>> You can choose to help.
> 
> Must I contribute to expect a somewhat stable and useful general
> purpose operating system?

TANSTAAFL