ip masquerading/subnets
bruce
bedouglas at earthlink.net
Mon Nov 26 23:56:39 UTC 2007
craig...
if you look at the diagram again.. box2 has ath0 which is on the 192.168.1
sub (it's 1.5). box2/eth0 is on a different sub, because as i understand it,
you can't have multiple nics on the same box, on the same subnet....
the issue is what has to be setup on box2 regarding iptables/route cmds to
allow this to all work.
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Craig White
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 3:40 PM
To: For users of Fedora
Subject: RE: ip masquerading/subnets
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 15:43 -0800, bruce wrote:
> Hi mike..
>
>
> here's my system:
>
> internet
>
>
> dsl box
> V
> V
> dlink router (192.168.1.100)
> V
> V
> switch ->>>>>>>>>>>>>>+
> ^ V
> ^ V
> ^ V
> box1 wireless access point (192.168.1.200)
> (eth0) |
> |(ath0)
> box2
> |(eth0)
> |
> box3 (future) (192.168.2.13)
>
> so:
> router - 192.168.1.100 (gateway)
> wireless access point - 192.168.1.200
> box1 (eth0) 192.168.1.3
>
> box2
> ath0 - 102.168.1.5
> eth0 - 102.168.2.5
>
> box3
> eth0 - 102.168.2.6
>
> box1 connects to the switch, which is connected to the access point via
the
> lan (eth) connection.
>
> so, everything is on the 192.168.1 subnet, except the eth0 nic of box2,
and
> the box3 that'll be added to interface with box2/eth0...
>
> box2 has ip_forwarding set.
>
> so my basic questions:
> -what do i need to do on box2 to allow a user to
> be able to do a "ping 192.168.2.5"
> -what do i need to do on box2 to allow a user on
> box1 to be able to "ping 192.168.2.5" and have a
> successful reply.
>
> bear with me !!
----
box 2 and 3 should be on same subnet as box 1 ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) because
wireless access point is not the same thing as a router.
Craig
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list