Audacity 1.3.4-beta for testers
stan
goedigi89__e at cox.net
Wed Nov 21 15:45:36 UTC 2007
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On 20/11/2007, stan <goedigi89__e at cox.net> wrote:
>
>> I then installed using rpm -Uvh audacity-1.3.4-0.2.beta.fc7.i386.rpm
>> and rpm -Uvh audacity-debuginfo-1.3.4-0.2.beta.fc7.i386.rpm
>>
>> They both installed
>> ]$ rpm -qa | grep -i audacity
>> audacity-debuginfo-1.3.4-0.2.beta.fc7
>> audacity-1.3.4-0.2.beta.fc7
>>
>> Unfortunately, they still had the problem. I couldn't play ogg, wav or
>> mp3 files.
>>
>
> "Couldn't play" or "couldn't load"? For mp3 decoding you would need to
> build "--with mp3" as you need libmad-devel which is not included with
> Fedora. Loading ogg and wav works here.
>
>
They loaded, but wouldn't play. The same error I get when running the
versions from
audacity.sourceforge.net. The dialog comes up saying to check the sound
card and rate.
I ran the rpmbuild --rebuild command on the src.rpm I downloaded. I
made no changes.
It is possible it found an mp3 library of some sort and included it
without my intervention.
>> Incidentally, even though the packages for audacity say 1.3.2, they are
>> actually
>> 1.3.4-beta.
>>
>> # yum list all | grep -i audacity
>> audacity.i386 1.3.4-0.2.beta.fc7
>> installed
>> audacity-debuginfo.i386 1.3.4-0.2.beta.fc7
>> installed
>> audacity.i386 1.3.2-14.fc7
>> fedora
>> audacity-debuginfo.i386 1.3.2-14.fc7
>> fedora-debuginfo
>> audacity-nonfree.i386 1.3.2-0.6.beta.lvn7 livna
>>
>
> No, the list is correct. Notice the right column (which you get when
> you run that command) where it says "installed". Where it says
> "fedora" or "livna", it refers to an uninstalled pkg in the
> repository.
>
>
No, that isn't true. I actually installed them and checked the help,
about for them.
They are 1.3.4-beta. And they don't work just like the downloads from
audacity.sourceforge.net.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list