SELinux Attack!

[Karl Larsen]

Andy Green wrote:
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>   
>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:32:11AM -0600, Karl Larsen wrote:
>>     
>>>    I will not turn on SELinux again until I see a update for dbus. It 
>>> appears dbus is used only by SELinux.
>>>       
>> Which is just yet another example of how fantastically good you are at
>> jumping to totally erroneous conclusions.
>>     
>
> Actually there isn't enough information kicking around to allow us to
> tell him that his 'conclusion' is definitely wrong.  But because of
> that, seems to me having a 'conclusion' at all is wrong... it's wrong
> even if it happens today's $CULPRIT happens to be the right one as it
> eventually will be by the law of averages.
>
> Karl can go on with selinux off and let's all worry about something else.
>
> -Andy
>
> You are right Andy let us drop this problem. Because no one was right. The problem is with dbus which is a requirement for SELinux it appears. There well may be something else that causes the dbus problem which today has a bug report re-opened on it. Some day we might know what is wrong. 




-- 

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.