2.6.23 kernel

[Karl Larsen]

Res wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Aly Dharshi wrote:
>
>>> ummmm when your responsible for what I am, yeah, because I'm paid to 
>>> not have things fuck up, but since we

>>> , you say it is your responsability, who else was involved with the 
>>> moving all servers to Slackware, we've never had a single hiccup, so 
>>> I aint had to any problems in years.

>>>
>>> for fucks sake, RH cant even sort out their own rsync servers, why 
>>> would I try trusting them again, its a complete joke, and the funny 
>>> thing is, the same person resposible for it is probably still in 
>>> that job
>>
>>     Which is why you would run something like RHEL for production
>
> No.... Its exactly why I dont run it. I've used RHEL, RHES and more 
> recently the RHEL clone CentOS, they are all still bloated to buggery, 
> unnecessary crud = unnecessary risks, Once a Slackware server is 
> installed it rarely needs to be touched, only if we want to put a new 
> kernel in, or the once in a blue moon security update, which is rare 
> because of the non-bloatness and non-butchering, slackware is 
> essentially a install and forget, it gives us more time to do new 
> projects.
>
>


-- 

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.