2.6.23 kernel

[Arthur Pemberton]

On 10/11/07, Karl Larsen <k5di at zianet.com> wrote:
> Res wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> >
> >>> ummmm when your responsible for what I am, yeah, because I'm paid to
> >>> not have things fuck up, but since we
>
> >>> , you say it is your responsability, who else was involved with the
> >>> moving all servers to Slackware, we've never had a single hiccup, so
> >>> I aint had to any problems in years.
>
> >>>
> >>> for fucks sake, RH cant even sort out their own rsync servers, why
> >>> would I try trusting them again, its a complete joke, and the funny
> >>> thing is, the same person resposible for it is probably still in
> >>> that job
> >>
> >>     Which is why you would run something like RHEL for production
> >
> > No.... Its exactly why I dont run it. I've used RHEL, RHES and more
> > recently the RHEL clone CentOS, they are all still bloated to buggery,
> > unnecessary crud = unnecessary risks, Once a Slackware server is
> > installed it rarely needs to be touched, only if we want to put a new
> > kernel in, or the once in a blue moon security update, which is rare
> > because of the non-bloatness and non-butchering, slackware is
> > essentially a install and forget, it gives us more time to do new
> > projects.
> >
> >


Please don't quote this idot, I've already blocked all emails from
him, don't give him a gateway into my inbox.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )