SELinux last straw

[Arthur Pemberton]

On 10/18/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>
> > Nothing warranting the kind of flaming that is going on. I've been
> > using SELinux when appropriate for years now.
>
> I think the real missing piece here is a good definition of
> 'appropriate' in this context (SELinux as delivered in fedora).  What
> situation warrants the extra trouble of managing it, yet can deal with
> the general unstability and update frequency of the distribution?


1) Desktop/workstations on the open internet
2) Testing for production system to be deployed on RHEL
3) Soon... general usage

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )