SELinux last straw

[Arthur Pemberton]

On 10/18/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>
> > Well it would be nice if you diccuss one topic at a time, fedora
> > updates is one matter, and SELinux history is another.
>
> You can't separate them unless you can describe the process someone
> would use to get one without the other.  It's a package deal.


I'll be back to respond properly, but please explain how we cannot get
"fedora _distro_ updates being non trivial" without "SELinux -
pros/cons" (i know this isn't your exact phrasing)

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )