not possible
Karl Larsen
k5di at zianet.com
Tue Oct 23 11:47:54 UTC 2007
Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 16:39 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote:
>
>> Again two hard drives IDE and SATA. Now SATA is /dev/sdf (hd5,2) and
>> fdisk finds it with no problem. But when I try to set up grub with:
>>
>> grub> root (hd5,2) it errors out saying no such location! Why can't grub
>> see that SATA drive?
>>
>
> GRUB counts hard drives, doesn't care where they're attached, it only
> counts the hard drives, skipping other drives.
>
> e.g.
>
> Port Connected Older Linux Grub
> -----------------------------------------------
> IDE1 primary HDD /dev/hda hd0
> IDE1 secondary nothing /dev/hdb
>
> IDE2 primary CD-ROM /dev/hdc
> IDE2 secondary Zip drive /dev/hdd
>
> IDE3 primary HDD /dev/hde hd1
> IDE3 secondary HDD /dev/hdf hd2
>
> I've picked on the older Linux scheme of absolutely referencing drives,
> being something that many of us are very familiar with, and to show what
> consistency versus inconsistency does for getting predictable results.
> I haven't worked out how the new /dev/sdx scheme will work, but I
> suspect you'd see this sort of thing:
>
> Port Connected Older Linux
> ---------------------------------------
> IDE1 primary HDD /dev/sda
> IDE1 secondary nothing
>
> IDE2 primary CD-ROM /dev/sdb
> IDE2 secondary Zip drive /dev/sdc
>
> IDE3 primary HDD /dev/sdd
> IDE3 secondary HDD /dev/sde
>
> And, if you plugged in an external USB drive, and *if* your BIOS will
> use USB first when there's something on it, you could expect them all to
> shift to higher letters, with your USB drive being /dev/sda.
>
>
That does not sound like progress. But it sounds different and would
mean you cannot live without labels and the whole thing will be a mess
to understand.
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list