nvidia

Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Mon Oct 29 02:44:21 UTC 2007


Ed Greshko wrote:
> Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:29:09 -0500
>> Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Except that the people 
>>> providing the binary do have a reason to care if it works.
>> Until they decide that it's time to sell you another card and discontinue their
>> binary blob for the model that you already have.
> 
> You mean like when a developer of an opensource project decides he doesn't
> want or can't continue to support the project and it closes down for lack of
> others picking up the mantle?

The difference is that, there is a opportunity for others to get 
involved which is not the case for non-free software. Most popular Free 
software projects frequently are supported by multiple groups even 
commercially and when one goes away, another steps up to fill in the gap 
as it has happened quite often and there is also the possibility that 
you hire others or get in-house people to maintain it. non-free software 
does give that level of control to end users.

This is apart from the legal issues involved in combining non-free 
modules and the Linux kernel for a distribution.

Rahul




More information about the fedora-list mailing list