nvidia

[David Boles]

on 10/29/2007 6:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> David Boles wrote:
> 
>>>> Honestly if these drives were as important to me as you say that they are
>>>> for you and that they worked with a different distro I would have switched
>>>> a long, long time ago.
>>> I did - and the Centosplus kernels have not given me any unpleasant 
>>> surprises.
>>
>> Interesting. CentOS 5 was supposed ti be  based on Fedora Core 6 work so
>> now I wonder just what the difference(s) are?
> 
> The difference is that RHEL (the sources that Centos recompiles) cares 
> enough about their user base to maintain a stable kernel interface for 
> the life of the distribution version - which is much longer than 
> fedora's.  The down side is that applications don't get version upgrades 
> as the distro version ages, just security and bugfix updates.
> 
>> As for Fedora itself. Since you no longer use it why to you care anymore?
> 
> I have more than one machine, so I track fedora  on a box that I can 
> afford to have fail to boot on occasion to know what to expect from the 
> next RHEL/Centos.


Ah! I see now. A 'bitch about it' box just for Fedora.  ;-)

-- 

  David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20071029/76c4e7a2/attachment-0001.sig>