How best get rid of SELinux?

[Steve Searle]

Around 03:56pm on Friday, September 21, 2007 (UK time), Mike McCarty scrawled:

> To put it another way: Where is the vast audience of Linux
> users who have been clamoring for improvements to security
> like those provided by SELinux?
> 
> There is an audience of Linux users who are requesting that
> it be removed.

Well there are some in this thread that appear to support it.  I am
"SELinux agnostic" and currently disable it.  But discussions that took
place on an earlier thread have made me decide to leave it enabled,
possibly in permissive mode, when I install the next Fedora release.

And there are a number of other distros that don't include it, so why
not leave the choice of using a distro with it or without it in place -
after all, choice is one of the good things about GNU/Linux, isn't it.

Steve

-- 

A:  Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q:  Why is top-posting a bad thing?

 15:59:39 up 7 days,  2:00,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.07
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070921/38740fd9/attachment-0001.sig>