[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: How best get rid of SELinux?



On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 10:09 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Mike McCarty wrote:
> > 
> >> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Note that contrary to your claims upstream has adopted it even before 
> >>> the first 2.6 kernel release and many other distributions are in-fact 
> >>> adopting it as you have agreed with the example of Debian earlier in 
> >>> this thread. Popularity doesn't determine the best choices. Otherwise 
> >>> we would be all running Windows now.
> >>
> >>
> >> You need to keep you attributions straight, Rahul. You are getting
> >> confused over who said what.
> > 
> > 
> > I don't see anyone wrongly attributed. Point out to me explicitly if 
> > that has happened.
> 
> That's because you're confused and not keeping track.
> 
> I'M the one who has pointed out that other distros have adopted
> SELinux, not Ralph. You are conflating the messages Ralf and I
> have sent. Ralf has consistently stated that other distros
> have not adopted SELinux.
Let me put it this way: To my knowledge, there is no other distro around
but Fedora which has been shipped with SELinux, so far, nor am I aware
about any other OS which has it.

It would be news to me if Debian should have adopted it.

Ralf



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]