[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: How best get rid of SELinux?

On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 14:56 -0400, David Boles wrote:
> everyone told you correctly that disabled really does mean that.
> Several mentioned something about 'disabled' that I have not seen you
> address. SELinux in not like a lamp. On (enabled/enforcing) and
> Permissive (enabled/reports only) keep the SELinux 'system' active and
> 'up to date' with the permissions. Disables (off) does not. So turning
> it off for a time and then turning it back on will most likely cause
> problems, from what I understand.

I'm fairly sure I've seen that mentioned in this thread, somewhere along
the line.  However, doing a relabel ought to put things to rights, if
one wanted to start using SELinux after your system had been used with
it turned off.

[tim bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr i686 i386

Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5.  Today, it's FC7.

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]