How best get rid of SELinux?

Mike McCarty Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net
Mon Sep 24 20:39:51 UTC 2007


Tim wrote:
> Tim: 
> 
>>>One of the (almost) unsung benefits of it is to do with created
>>>software.  
>>>
>>>If the programmers use a system with SELinux, they're forced into
>>>writing their software better.  And we end up with software which
> 
> 
> Mike McCarty: 
> 
>>They are forced into writing it SELinux aware. That is not
>>part of my definition of "better".
> 
> 
> This is you trying to fit it into your blinkered view.  You harp on
> about it being about mitigating already compromised machines, which is
> an over-simplification to the point of being stupidly and utterly wrong.
> 
> Ignoring your ignorance, for the moment.  If you read what I wrote, and

[...]

> Oh do some research!
> 

My ignorance is based on reading NSA's descriptions of SELinux.
Now, I've read some of Red Hat's docu as well.

Still ignorant, I guess.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!




More information about the fedora-list mailing list