How best get rid of SELinux?
Mike McCarty
Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net
Mon Sep 24 20:39:51 UTC 2007
Tim wrote:
> Tim:
>
>>>One of the (almost) unsung benefits of it is to do with created
>>>software.
>>>
>>>If the programmers use a system with SELinux, they're forced into
>>>writing their software better. And we end up with software which
>
>
> Mike McCarty:
>
>>They are forced into writing it SELinux aware. That is not
>>part of my definition of "better".
>
>
> This is you trying to fit it into your blinkered view. You harp on
> about it being about mitigating already compromised machines, which is
> an over-simplification to the point of being stupidly and utterly wrong.
>
> Ignoring your ignorance, for the moment. If you read what I wrote, and
[...]
> Oh do some research!
>
My ignorance is based on reading NSA's descriptions of SELinux.
Now, I've read some of Red Hat's docu as well.
Still ignorant, I guess.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list