Internet traffic and Azureus -

Res res at ausics.net
Tue Sep 25 10:22:41 UTC 2007


On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Andy Green wrote:

> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
>> be released in this country movies, but then again, have you ever known
>> a criminal to admit what they are doing is wrong without being caught,
>> have you ever known a spamemr to think what he/she is doing is spamming,
>> its all denials, adn we see right through you :)
>
> I googled on Australia civil criminal copyright and it seems your laws
> are a mixture of civil and criminal liability as I expected, depending
> on what the offense was.  There was a change in 2006 that criminalized
> some specific stuff around software copying it seems, but the minor
> noncommercial media copying law appears to remain a civil offense.

As one who deals with the Federal Police most often in supplying user 
details for investigation for prosecution on these matters I can assure 
you its more criminal :)

>
> Even in Australia ;-) you might get into trouble calling people
> "criminal" when nobody found them guilty and it would be a civil offense
> anyway.

Actually, no, because I have the authority under the telecommunications 
act to monitor any data passing through my network, either at direction of 
a L.E.A, or because  i "suspect" someone is up to no good, I can 
guaranteee you, the people that try to do 300G  a month are all illegal 
p2p'rs, because they are the ones who cry the loudest when somthing does 
not work or its going "slow", I and any of my associates look and we can 
see what they are doing and know they are comitting offences, so we have 
the captured proof, and "truth" is an acceptable defence.


>> tier 1 extortionate interconnects, we can pay anywhere up to 30 times
>> what U.S ISPs do per data (they blame it on the loooooooonnnnggggg trans
>> pacific haul), so there will never be such a thing as true unlimited on
>> a survivable business model in this country :)
>> Certainly not in any forseeable future.
>
> Seems we agree greed and bad service from the carriers is the problem.

Well we had to agree to somthing adventually :)
But I still dont beleive that gives the users the right to treat their 
conenction as a 1:1, they are in a shared pool, like all ISP's run, thats 
why many ISP's have business grades, which are in fact 1:1, and should be 
because they pay for it.

-- 

Cheers
Res




More information about the fedora-list mailing list