How best (BUT WHY) get rid of SELinux?

[Craig White]

On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:02 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Craig White wrote:
> >On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:21 +1000, Res wrote:
> >> knowing when they are done it works, not have to contact the NOC at 5AM
> >> because selinux has fucked them up the ass and they are stressing their
> >> clients cant interact with them,
> >
> >----
> >nice - thanks for the visual metaphor - good thing you won't be confused
> >with someone with an objective point of view.
> >
> Stuff it Craig.  Just because he doesn't have a view that co-incides with 
> yours, doesn't mean he doesn't have a right to say it.
----
stuff it?

The metaphor employed by Res simply is not appropriate for the list. His
point of view is/was/has been a non sequitur...and the reference to
repetitive anal insertion is at best stupid.

Should anyone infer something from your defense of his anal insertion
references?