How best (BUT WHY) get rid of SELinux?

[Gene Heskett]

On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Craig White wrote:
>On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:02 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Craig White wrote:
>> >On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:21 +1000, Res wrote:
>> >> knowing when they are done it works, not have to contact the NOC at 5AM
>> >> because selinux has fucked them up the ass and they are stressing their
>> >> clients cant interact with them,
>> >
>> >----
>> >nice - thanks for the visual metaphor - good thing you won't be confused
>> >with someone with an objective point of view.
>>
>> Stuff it Craig.  Just because he doesn't have a view that co-incides with
>> yours, doesn't mean he doesn't have a right to say it.
>
>----
>stuff it?
>
>The metaphor employed by Res simply is not appropriate for the list. His
>point of view is/was/has been a non sequitur...and the reference to
>repetitive anal insertion is at best stupid.
>
>Should anyone infer something from your defense of his anal insertion
>references?

That is not worth an answer, it was a figure of speech YOU chose to 
concentrate on.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Lady Luck brings added income today.  Lady friend takes it away tonight.