low power tv

[Tom Poe]

Ric Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 00:52 -0500, Tom Poe wrote:
>   
>> g wrote:
>>     
>>> things just got interesting. part 15.247 does not really apply as i would have
>>> expected it to be.
>>>
>>> from what i have found so far, i can see that there is more to find and read.
>>>
>>> from what i have found and read, i will say this, go for it.
>>>
>>> as long as what ever system you use is within guide lines of part 15, you
>>> should be safe.
>>>
>>> i do recommend that you get full part 15 and read thru it to be familiar with
>>> what you are dealing with.
>>>
>>> in using such low power, you will be limited to near 'line of sight' coverage
>>> and you may get some degrading due to terrain, buildings and such.
>>>
>>> over all, your intent of use may be satisfied with results you want. as was
>>> said, $80 is not much to spend on such equipment.
>>>
>>>
>>> - --
>>>
>>> tc,hago.
>>>
>>> g
>>> .
>>>   
>>>       
>> There's lots of activity when I type keywords, video conference distance 
>> learning, but nothing at the no budget level, yet.  Seems like there's 
>> going to be a server/client network description someplace.  
>>     
> Tom, Check out Wonderland from Sun Microsystems. It runs under Java,
> provides a 3D world builder and get this, it'll run X11 apps within. I'm
> having problems getting the darn thing to connect as it uses inet6 but
> others have done it. It might be worth looking into. 
>
>   
Ric:  Good pointer.  It definitely would be an excellent use of a 
community wireless network (intranet).  Might be even a critical one for 
introducing our local teachers to computers and how they can be used in 
the classroom for collaborative educational projects.

I saw Firefox boosting notes that called for disabling inet6 as one step 
to speed up browsing.  I wonder if you have to do something similar with 
your system whenever you move to Wonderland. 
Tom