Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves

[max bianco]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> max bianco wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > David Boles wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Life is not....
> > > > >
> > > > > But this "discussion" is...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I recall that 'it', this discussion, starts just before a release and
> > > >
> > > continues for weeks. Then it dies only to be resurrected again with the
> > > coming of the next  release.  ;-)
> > > It actually means that the code in the wild is in pretty good shape when
> > > conversations here are philosophical instead of "why doesn't this
> work?".
> > >
> > >
> > So Fedora has improved over the years....i was starting to wonder why
> > anyone used it.
> >
>
> Read the lead in closely.  What actually happens is that each new release
> ships new bugs but by the end of it's short life they have mostly been fixed
> by updates.  If you've paid attention over the years, you might also notice
> a longer cycle where the versions that are concurrent with each RHEL cut are
> the most stable, with big changes in the following fedora release.
>
> --
>  Les Mikesell
>    lesmikesell at gmail.com
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>

 I don't really use Fedora I just play someone that does on a mailing list. : )

Max